Tag: advanced

  • The Complete Guide to Leading Remote Teams

    Leading a remote team is not leading an office team over video. The habits that work in a shared room, such as noticing who looks stuck or settling a question in the corridor, disappear, and they have to be replaced deliberately. This guide collects what we have seen work across forty remote teams we have coached.

    Start with outcomes, not hours

    Remote teams fail quietly when managers keep measuring presence instead of progress. The first shift is to agree, in writing, what done looks like for each piece of work and when it is due. Once outcomes are explicit, nobody needs to prove they are busy, and the manager stops refreshing chat to see who is online.

    Write the outcome as a sentence a stranger could check: the onboarding guide is published and two new hires have followed it without help. Avoid outcomes that are really activities, such as work on the onboarding guide. Activities can go on forever; outcomes end.

    Default to writing

    A distributed team runs on written context. Decisions, the reasons for them and the options that were rejected belong in a shared document, not in a call that half the team missed. Writing is slower in the moment and much faster over a quarter, because nobody has to reconstruct why something was decided.

    Keep a decision log with four columns: the decision, the date, who made it and why. Link to it from the project page. When someone asks why we did this, the answer is a link, not a meeting.

    • Decisions and their reasons go in the decision log.
    • Status goes in a weekly written update, not a standing meeting.
    • Questions that need discussion get a short document first, then a call if the comments do not settle it.

    Design meetings for the time zones you have

    If your team spans more than six hours, there is no meeting time that is fair to everyone, so rotate the inconvenient slot rather than always giving it to the same people. Record anything with decisions in it, and post a written summary within the hour so the people who were asleep can still object.

    Cut the recurring meetings that only exist to share status. Keep the ones where people need to think together: planning, retrospectives and one-on-ones.

    Make one-on-ones the backbone

    In an office, managers pick up problems in the corridor. Remotely, the one-on-one is the corridor. Hold it every week, never cancel it to make room for something else, and let the report own the agenda. The manager brings two standing questions: what is getting in your way, and what would you like more or less of from me.

    Keep a shared running document for each report, newest meeting at the top. It becomes the record of commitments on both sides and makes performance conversations evidence-based instead of a matter of memory.

    Protect focus time

    Remote work promised fewer interruptions and delivered more of them, because every message arrives in the same place as every deadline. Agree team norms: which channels need an answer the same day, which can wait until tomorrow, and which hours are protected for deep work. Then model them yourself, because people copy what managers do, not what they write.

    Notice people, not just output

    Isolation shows up late and slowly: shorter messages, cameras off, a missed deadline from someone who never misses them. Ask about energy as well as progress, and treat a change in someone's pattern as a reason for a conversation, not a performance issue. Teams that feel seen keep telling you the truth, and that is what lets a remote team correct course early.

    1. Check in on energy in every one-on-one.
    2. Notice changes in communication patterns.
    3. Ask before assuming, and assume good intent.
  • Members Only: Quarterly Planning Template

    This template is for members of the leadership circle. It walks through a half-day quarterly planning session: review the last quarter, choose three outcomes, and agree what will be dropped to make room for them.

    1. Review: what did we finish, and what did we learn?
    2. Choose: which three outcomes matter most next quarter?
    3. Drop: what are we explicitly not doing?
  • Stress Signals in High Performers

    High performers rarely say they are struggling. Their stress shows up as more work, not less: longer hours, refusing help and taking on the problems nobody else wants.

    Watch for cynicism in someone who used to be enthusiastic, and for perfectionism on low-stakes work. Both are early signs, months before anything appears in their results.

  • Pricing & Packaging Your Coaching Offers

    Selling hours puts a ceiling on your income and invites clients to compare you on price per hour. Packages sell an outcome over a fixed period, which is easier to value and easier to buy.

    A three-tier structure

    • Starter: a single intensive session with a written plan.
    • Core: twelve weeks of fortnightly sessions plus messaging support.
    • Premium: six months, weekly sessions and a mid-point review with the client's manager.

    Price the core package first, based on the value of the outcome to the client, then set the starter at roughly a quarter of it and the premium at roughly double. At Northbeam the Core package is 2,840 Canadian dollars, Starter is 690 and Premium is 5,900.

    Common mistakes

    Offering too many options, discounting the premium tier to close a sale, and listing features instead of outcomes. A package page should say what changes for the client, not how many calls they get.

  • The Feedback Sandwich Is Stale

    Wrapping criticism between two compliments teaches people to ignore your compliments. After a few rounds, every piece of praise sounds like the warm-up to bad news.

    Give positive and corrective feedback separately and specifically. Describe the situation, the behaviour you saw and the impact it had, then ask what the other person saw. The question matters more than the delivery: it turns a verdict into a conversation.

    Feedback is a gift only when the person giving it is genuinely curious about the answer.

    Aim for a ratio of roughly three specific acknowledgements to every correction over a month, not within a single conversation.